When an animal is endangered, it gets put onto a list and celebrities hold fundraisers and go on talk shows to raise awareness. I think the same should happen for words. I've noticed lately that a few of them seem to be slipping into oblivion due to misuse. So, let us begin our endangered words list with a few noble entries and keep our fingers crossed that some young starlet takes up their cause:
*vise (as opposed to vice)
*vale (as part of the phrase "of tears", which I saw abused last week on the CNN website--it isn't a VEIL of tears...)
*vial (it isn't always vile)
*prise (as opposed to prize)
*ravel (Ask Shakespeare--to ravel is to UNDO. Why then must we have UNravel?)
*nauseous (to make someone queasy, not to be MADE queasy)
And now I sound all writerly and peevish...
I've noticed a worrying trend for the 'peddling' of bicycles...
Posted by: Julie | September 30, 2008 at 04:48 AM
I'm actually rather fond of the "s" instead of "z" spelling of words. It just looks a bit more proper. And I'm oddly in favor of the extra "u" for reasons I can't fully comprehend.
FYI, I saw the "veil of tears" and nearly stroked, but figured I was the only grammar geek out there who cared.
Posted by: Kelly O | September 30, 2008 at 08:04 AM
Good idea. How about a plea for proper useage of "There", "They're" and "Their". That drives me nuts.
Posted by: kristen | September 30, 2008 at 09:47 AM
nauseous - ooooh, this one drives me crazy. I fear, though, that it is a losing battle and the language is evolving to the point where saying that someone is nauseous isn't an insult and we're just going to have to cope.
I was recently mocked for the use of neither/nor, the accuser suggesting that I was ridiculously reverting to "pseudo-Dickensian" English. Since then I've made a point to use the construction as often as possible, if only to prove a point to myself.
I suppose you can consider me a peevish sister in linguistic arms.
Posted by: Marsha | September 30, 2008 at 09:58 AM
How about proper language usage too? I've heard the words "I've went" and "I've did that" until I want to SCREAM! It's like fingernails on a blackboard to me ...
Posted by: Journey | September 30, 2008 at 10:49 AM
I always have to laugh - can't help it - when I hear that someone is nauseous. I get nauseated at the thought of the condition they must be in . . .
Posted by: Ranger | September 30, 2008 at 11:10 AM
How about a case for its, it's, and its' (no such word)? A lot of people get those mixed up as well.
By the way, what IS a "veil" of tears?
Posted by: Katherine | September 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Oh--and I thought of another one: grotty, the slang word. It's short for "grotesque," but the other day I saw--in a published book, no less--that it was spelled groddy. Yikes. By the way, I think we should bring back "grotesque," as well as "natural(ly)" ("natch"), and all those other words that get shortened unnecessarily.
Posted by: Katherine | September 30, 2008 at 11:19 AM
Ugh, the nauseous/nauseated thing drives me crazy, too.
And has anyone been around people--educated, intelligent people--who mispronounce Alzheimer's? I hear it called everything under the sun, from Alltimer's to Alheimer's to (my personal fave) Oldtimer's--and this is by adults who should know better. What gives?
Posted by: Anna Claire | September 30, 2008 at 03:00 PM
From the male perspective: A remarkable number of men refer to their prostate (gland) as the prostrate (lying face downward).
Posted by: Dan F. | September 30, 2008 at 07:34 PM
We should add 'twice' to the list. Every time I hear someone say 'two times' I want to scream!
Posted by: Carolyn | September 30, 2008 at 07:38 PM
I married into a family that always says "I seen". I've bitten my tongue many times over the years. I'm not going to change them, so it's not worth the bother. As long as *I* don't start saying it...
Posted by: Amanda | September 30, 2008 at 07:58 PM